Asian Reporter web extra, November 4, 2024
POLITICS GET PERSONAL. Diana Xue poses for a photo at her home in
Orlando, Florida. Xue is a naturalized U.S. citizen born in China who
used to vote more Republican but has changed her mind after Florida
passed the alien land law. (AP Photo/John Raoux)
State alien land laws drive some China-born U.S.
citizens to rethink their politics
By Terry Tang and Didi Tang
The Associated Press
Diana Xue has always followed the politics of her husband, friends,
and neighbors in Orlando, Florida, and voted Republican.
This Election Day, she’ll break that pattern.
When Florida’s GOP-dominated legislature and Republican governor
enacted a law last year banning Chinese nationals without permanent U.S.
residency from buying property or land, Xue, who became a U.S. citizen
about a decade after coming from China for college, had an "awakening."
She felt then that the Sunshine State had, more or less, legalized
discrimination against Chinese people.
Florida has proved reliably Republican in recent years, but Xue said,
"Because of this law, I will start to help out, flip every seat I can."
At least two dozen states have passed or proposed "alien land laws"
targeting Chinese nationals and companies from purchasing property or
land because of China’s status as a foreign adversary. Other countries
are mentioned, but experts say China is the constant focus in political
discussions.
Mostly Republican legislators have pushed the land laws amid growing
fears of intelligence and economic threats from China. At the time of
the Florida law’s signing, governor Ron DeSantis called China the
"greatest geopolitical threat" to the U.S. and said the law was taking a
stand against the Chinese Communist Party.
Some China-born people with American citizenship are now feeling
alienated by the laws to the point that they are leaning Democratic.
Many are afraid of being treated wrongly because of their ethnicity.
U.S.-China tensions hit a fever pitch in February 2023 after a
suspected Chinese spy balloon was spotted over Montana. Shortly after,
GOP-leaning states like Missouri, Texas, and Tennessee introduced
similar land ownership measures.
The measures all involved restrictions on businesses or people from
China and other foreign adversaries, including not buying land within a
certain distance from military installations or "critical
infrastructure." Under some of the laws, very narrow exceptions were
made for non-tourist visa holders and people who have been granted
asylum.
The National Agricultural Law Center now estimates 24 states ban or
limit foreigners without residency and foreign businesses or governments
from owning private farmland. Interest in farmland ownership
restrictions emerged after a Chinese billionaire bought more than
130,000 acres near a U.S. Air Force base in Texas, and Chinese company
Fufeng Group sought to build a corn plant near an Air Force base on 300
acres in North Dakota.
Liu Pengyu, the spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington,
raised concerns that such laws not only counter market economy
principles and international trade rules, but "further fuel hostility
towards the Asian and Chinese community in the U.S., intensify racial
discrimination, and seriously undermine the values that the U.S. claims
to hold."
State laws banning Chinese nationals from owning land discourage
Chinese investors and spook other foreign investors who would otherwise
help the U.S. to rebuild its industrial base, said John Ling, who has
worked for decades to attract international, especially Chinese,
manufacturing projects to the U.S.
The laws have also thrown off real estate agents and brokers. Angela
Hsu, a commercial real estate attorney in Atlanta, said it’s been
confusing to navigate a law Georgia’s governor signed in April
restricting land sales to some Chinese citizens.
"The brokers I’ve talked to, they’re just trying to figure out what
they can do safely," Hsu said.
On the federal level, the House of Representatives in September
approved a bill that would flag as "reportable" farmland sales involving
citizens from China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran. The odds for it to
win approval from the senate, however, are slim.
China "has been quietly purchasing American agricultural land at an
alarming rate, and this bill is a crucial step towards reversing that
trend," said representative Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington
state.
Democratic representative Maxine Waters, of California, joined
multiple Asian American organizations in opposing the bill, arguing its
"broad-brush approach" of targeting people from specific countries
amounted to racial profiling.
China owns less than 1% of total foreign-owned farmland in the U.S.,
far behind Canada, the Netherlands, Italy, the U.K., Germany, or
Portugal.
After Florida’s land law was signed in May 2023, four Chinese
nationals filed a lawsuit. In April, an American Civil Liberties Union
attorney representing them asked a federal appeals court to block it.
The saga sparked the Chinese diaspora in Florida to mobilize. Some
formed the Florida Asian American Justice Alliance. Among them was Xue.
She became interested in studying the legislature and lobbying. She
found that only Democrats like state representative Anna Eskamani, who
is Iranian American, agreed the law was xenophobic.
"She said, ‘This is discrimination. I’ll stand with you, and I’ll
fight with you,’" Xue said.
Hua Wang, board chair of another civic engagement group, United
Chinese Americans, said more people are becoming aware that these laws
are directly "affecting each one of us."
"There are people in both Texas and Florida who say for the first
time they are becoming interested and they become organized," Wang said.
Land laws passed in the name of national security echo a pattern from
World War II, when the U.S. saw Japanese people as threats, said Chris
Suh, a professor of Asian American history at Emory University. It’s
difficult to argue the laws are unconstitutional if on paper they are
citizenship-based and other countries are named, Suh said.
Anti-Chinese sentiment has shaped policies going back more than 150
years. Among these was the Page Act of 1875, which strategically limited
the entry of Chinese women to the U.S., and the 1882 Chinese Exclusion
Act, the first broad race-based immigration law.
Policies targeting foreigners hurt the bottom line of all Americans,
Suh said, noting that excluding Chinese laborers from railroad work or
Japanese immigrants from buying homes didn’t benefit U.S. railroad
tycoons and landowners.
"That’s something to keep in today’s context as well," Suh said. "One
of the key allies of the people who are trying to overturn the alien
land law in Florida are the people who are going to lose money if they
lose the potential buyers of their land."
The law makes Chinese immigrants who achieved citizenship worry about
things like racism or accusations of being a spy in their own home, Xue
said.
"You think it’s nothing to do with you, but people look at you — how
you look, how your last name is," Xue said. "They are not going to ask
you are you a U.S. citizen or not."
Terry Tang reported from Phoenix. Didi Tang reported from Washington.
Read the current issue of The Asian Reporter in
its entirety!
Just visit <www.asianreporter.com/completepaper.htm>!
|